comparing

Home

Comparing performance off different Receivers on very weak signals

In this page I want to show the performance from different Receivers in ability to receive and show very weak signals

I want to compare the following available receivers

Demodulated signal and Spectrum display and/or Waterfall

Spectravue and funcube dongle

ICOM IC7300

ICOM IC7700

Perseus SDR

Only demodulated signal

Kenwood TS2000

Kenwood TS870

ICOM IC7100

Yeasu FT736

ICOM IC202

 

Demodulated signal and Spectrum display or Waterfall

In my weak signal experiments and when I was working Aircraft Scatter I found that using a well performing Spectrum display combined with a waterfall it was possible to clearly see very weak signals still too weak to copy or even be audible. In using a funcube dongle and Spectravue with settings optimised for showing very weak signals I could see signals well before I could hear them

In the next part I will show the spectrum display off different receivers with signals signal to noise levels off :
4dB@12 Hz  = -20dB@3KHz
6dB@12 Hz  = -18dB@3KHz
8dB@12 Hz  = -16dB@3KHz
10dB@12 Hz  = -14dB@3KHz

To be sure that I don't get differences in results caused by the different frontends I am using a high input level at the receiver frontend so that the noise floor from the signals I generated are at least 20 dB above the receivers own noise floor


 First off all my performance using Spectravue and a funcube dongle

All these Spectravue pictures have been made using an FFT Ave of 5 and 12Hz resolution bandwidth

4dB@12 Hz  = -20dB@3KHz

6dB@12 Hz  = -18dB@3KHz

8dB@12 Hz  = -16dB@3KHz

10dB@12 Hz  = -14dB@3KHz


performance using Icom IC7300